Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (6397)	4/2/2002 4:28:42 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21057

Ah. I think you are right that it was not fraud but the claim was disallowed by Leonard the investigator; thus the historical tie in. Still...."He (Sammy) remained at home, and was only locked up because he was helpless after his wife died. Sammy would be locked up because he was using the system. But Leonard was not using the system so he would not be locked up until or unless his problems impacted the system. "Leonard would be locked up, not for homicide, but for his condition, no longer having a close relative to care for him." Not necessarily. Teddy's explanation still makes sense.