SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ahda who wrote (84126)4/2/2002 5:06:36 PM
From: long-gone  Respond to of 117063
 
You got it! The market thinks (rightly or wrongly - matters not) ABX is in the paper not the gold business.



To: Ahda who wrote (84126)4/2/2002 7:09:31 PM
From: Enigma  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 117063
 
According to Russett on the Barrick thread only 18% of Barrick's reserves are hedged - which means that 82% (!) are unhedged. A pretty prudent stance don't you think? BTW here's a comparison over the last year:

quicken.com

Even though Barrick's performance is middling it's up by nearly 50% over the period , and who knows, it may be the leader of these companies a year from now? There's a lot of nonsense being spewed about Barrick - it has huge reserves, efficient mines, and other mothballed mines which can be brought into production should the price warrant.

There are a few people on this thread who let their irrational hatred of a company blind them to the reality of the situation. It's funny really because to read their posts you'd think they were supporters of GATA. Come to think of it maybe they are? I'm not sure that Richard or Ken Benes for that matter ever attack Doug AK. I haven't kept track of who's for who or against what, but I do know that some of these guys will try every little piece of innuendo to slag Barrick - even suggesting that it is a sort of Enron situation! Cheap stuff of course and perhaps in part it explains why the stock has laggged some of the others recently. Let's see what a year brings.

.



To: Ahda who wrote (84126)4/2/2002 7:26:05 PM
From: Enigma  Respond to of 117063
 
Sorry Darlene i misread the chart - Barrick is only up just under 40% for the year.



To: Ahda who wrote (84126)4/3/2002 8:56:04 AM
From: Gord Bolton  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 117063
 
Gold to test US$350

library.northernlight.com



To: Ahda who wrote (84126)4/3/2002 1:46:37 PM
From: long-gone  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 117063
 
High-Paid Jobs Latest U.S. Export

High-Paid Jobs Latest U.S. Export
Firms' shifting of technical work to Mexico and China to cut costs bodes
ill for many laid-off Americans.

latimes.com
By EVELYN IRITANI, Times Staff Writer

For more than a century, Emerson Electric Co. rode the business cycle,
expanding when sales were high and cutting jobs when revenue went south.

That is still the strategy as the U.S. economy is poised to turn the
corner, but there is a twist: The St. Louis-based multinational won't be
hiring at its rural Mississippi plant--that facility is shutting down.
Instead, it expects to be hiring in China, the Philippines or Mexico. And
it won't just be assembly-line jobs going offshore. Emerson hopes to move
at least half of its engineering work to China and India.

Emerson's example bodes ill for millions of laid-off Americans, who may
never see their jobs return with the economic recovery.

The increased flow of trade and investment across borders played a large
role in the economic expansion of the last decade. Now, during an economic
contraction, the flip side of globalization is apparent: U.S. firms are
finding cheaper places to do business where they also can sell their goods.
Along with computer chips and airplanes, it is jobs and investment dollars
sailing offshore.

"We want to make sure when we come out of this recession we'll be ready,"
David Farr, Emerson's chief executive, told analysts recently. "When we
finish this calendar year 2002, 70% of our manufacturing will be in
low-cost countries. That's a significant change from where we were before."

In recent months, Emerson announced the closure of its plant in Oxford,
Miss., and cutbacks in Montreal. A factory in Monterrey, Mexico, is closing
and some of the work is being shifted to China. By the end of this year,
the company will have shuttered 50 facilities and cut its work force by 10%.

"We've got to get the same amount of output, the same level of technology
without spending as much capital," Farr said.

Others are close behind. Black & Decker Corp., the nation's largest power
tool manufacturer, has announced the closure of three plants, including a
400-employee Pacoima facility, and a shift of that production to Mexico,
China and Eastern Europe. Battery maker Evercel Inc. is closing plants in
Connecticut and Virginia and moving assembly work to a joint-venture plant
in Xiamen, China. Lear Corp., the world's fifth-largest auto parts maker,
said it will eliminate 6,500 jobs and close 21 facilities, nearly
two-thirds in the higher-cost regions of the U.S., Canada and Europe. The
company would not provide a breakdown of where the jobs would be lost.

Lear Chief Executive Bob Rossiter said the restructuring represents "tough
decisions to right size our company for future success."

Emerson's decision to move the work of its Oxford plant to Mexico and China
means that 500 jobs--a quarter of the town's manufacturing base--will
disappear.

When Max Hipp, executive director of the Oxford-Lafayette County Economic
Development Foundation, first heard the bad news, he tried to persuade the
town's largest private employer to stay. But Oxford, a town of 11,756 where
the median income is $20,383, already offers some of the cheapest labor and
operating costs in the United States.

"We talked about ways to save it, but with something of this magnitude and
the type of competition we face, there's really nothing we can do," the
Oxford native said. "If we eliminated their [Emerson's] entire tax burden,
that wouldn't make a difference."

Labor leaders and other globalization critics had hoped the airport
shutdowns and lengthy border delays that followed the Sept. 11 attacks
would prompt U.S. firms to keep work at home.

"Certainly we hope that American companies will be feeling patriotic and
they will have some commitment to their communities and their workers and
will address their cost pressures in some other way than by outsourcing,"
said Thea Lee, an assistant director for international economics with the
AFL-CIO in Washington.

"With profits at the lowest percentage of corporate revenues in the postwar
period, firms are being forced to reevaluate their business models and
figure out whether or not things can be done more efficiently," said Ross
DeVol, director of regional studies at the Santa Monica-based Milken
Institute. "The recession just accelerates that trend."

Manufacturing jobs historically have been the most vulnerable to global
competition, but the latest round of outsourcing also is hitting telephone
operators, graphic designers, accountants and engineers.

Trade experts argue that this global repositioning is healthy, simply
stepping up the shift of the U.S. economy toward a more high-tech provider
of services and more sophisticated products. By taking advantage of lower
costs abroad, U.S. firms can retain their competitive edge and gain inroads
in fast-growing markets in Asia and Latin America.

The beneficiaries include export-oriented developing countries slammed by
the U.S. slowdown. Leading that list is China, a more attractive place to
operate since it joined the World Trade Organization in December and agreed
to play by global trade rules. In spite of the global downturn, foreign
investment in China was up 14.9% in 2001 from the previous year, according
to China's Ministry of Foreign Trade and Economic Cooperation.

U.S. firms are attracted to outsourcing because it makes it easier to
adjust their production and transfers the overhead costs and labor expenses
to their subcontractors. From 1996 to 2000, outsourcing by U.S. firms
tripled from $100 billion to $345 billion a year, according to John
Challenger, chief executive of Challenger, Gray & Christmas, an
international outplacement firm.

Since the September attacks, companies are scrutinizing their supply chain
for weaknesses and looking more carefully at the stability of their foreign
suppliers and the countries where they do business, said John Coyle, a
professor at the Center for Supply Chain Research at Pennsylvania State
University's Smeal College of Business Administration.

"Sure they're really concerned [about Sept. 11] and they've put in place
safeguards, but no one is saying, 'We're not going to be global,' " he said.

In the U.S., labor-intensive jobs in textile and apparel manufacturing,
toys and light electronics migrated long ago to low-cost production areas
in Asia and Latin America. Now, it is more sophisticated industries such as
semiconductor and aerospace manufacturing and network computing that are
moving offshore, in part because a strong dollar raises the price of U.S.
exports.

Belt-tightening in the battered commercial aerospace industry has forced
companies such as Honeywell International Inc. and General Electric Co. to
look south for cheaper sources of components. Honeywell, which purchases
15% of its $1.4 billion a year in raw materials abroad, held a suppliers
conference recently in Monterrey.

"We still probably do less off-shore sourcing than most industries, but
with the dollar where it has been the last couple years, there's even more
pressure to look offshore," said Joel Johnson, vice president of
international affairs for the Aerospace Industries Assn. of America.
"Aerospace companies are doing more and more work in Mexico."

Michael Stow, president of Orange-based Arden Engineering Inc., is bucking
the trend. Though he lost some commercial aerospace orders in the Sept. 11
fallout, he has picked up business on the military side. By forging
long-term contracts with raw-material suppliers and upgrading his
machinery, he has been able to keep his 85 jobs in the U.S. and stay
competitive. He also produces more sophisticated structural components that
aerospace firms are less willing to source abroad.

But thanks to infusions of foreign investment and technology, developing
countries are moving up the manufacturing chain quickly.

In Emerson's reconfigured world, power modules or motors would be designed
in St. Louis but engineered and produced in Shenzhen, China, or Mexicali,
Mexico. Customers calling Emerson's ClosetMaid subsidiary would talk to an
operator in the Philippines. An accounts-payable center in the Philippines
or India would handle the bills for all of North America, a consolidation
of 400 offices.

China is fast becoming a linchpin in Emerson's global empire, contributing
44% of last year's $1.7-billion sales in Asia. In addition to being a cheap
manufacturing base, China represents one of the world's fastest-growing
markets for Emerson's power conversion and compressor technology and plant
automation systems.

CEO Farr believes Emerson has a lot to learn from China about producing a
good product at the lowest price.

"They can engineer a product so much faster than we can," he said. "They
can get a product family out in 12 months when it would take us two years'
time."