Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ThirdEye who wrote (244784)	4/2/2002 7:28:56 PM
From: Srexley	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

"If you believe Berry was faking, then she was good enough to win the award--something that sticks in Coulter's craw" Bullcrap 3rd. I never doubted that she was a good enough actor to win the award. And Coulter probably does not either. Insinuating Coulter is a racist is just as bad as Berry insinuating the Hollywood ultra liberal community is racist. It is offensive to see a nice moment in someone's career politicized with a false and patronizing message. If the academy is prejudiced, as Berry stated, then do an investigation or name some names. "I should have asked whether Coulter would have considered Poitier a phony back then in the same way she savaged Berry for her behavior now" I doubt it. Do you have any other evidence of Coulter's racism other than this article? If you are strictly using Berry's speech and Coulter's editorial to decide who is a racist then you are the racist. If I only had those two pieces of information, I would assume Berry to be the racist. But that would be unfair and prejudiced of me, and I doubt that either is a racist. Coulter spoke what she felt about the speech, and it coincided with my feelings almost to the t. And I know that I am not a racist.