Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elsewhere who wrote (23222)	4/2/2002 9:14:13 PM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

Anyone get the sense we're seeing the US play the role of "good cop", while Israel plays "bad cop"... I'm seeing more and more Palestinian spokespeople begging the US to intervene and save their bacon.. But it isn't going to happen without the US gaining some significant political capital in the region as a result of restraining the Israelis. Especially now, in light of the documents they are discovering detailing the PA's direct financing of terrorist bombings. Btw, I believe we've only see the tip of the iceberg with regard to the amount of intelligence the Israelis have been pulling from Arafat's headquarters. Hawk

To: Elsewhere who wrote (23222)	4/3/2002 2:38:23 PM
From: Ilaine	Respond to of 281500

>>EU looks for own role in crisis 04.04.2002 - By CATHERINE FIELD in Paris Little by little, Europe is distancing itself from the United States in the Middle East crisis. It is finding the confidence to speak up in defence of the Palestinians and to oppose US pressure to attack Iraq. The US is widely regarded as being uninterested in the role of peace broker or is being discounted because of its alliance with Israel, and more eyes are turning to Brussels to grope for some way out of the Mideast bloodbath. The European Union does not have the clout with Israel that Washington has, and its own voice is weakened by the differing opinions of its 15 national Governments. Positions range from the Greeks, who are pro-Arab, and the French, who are suspicious of Washington, to the British, who are staunchly pro-American. But despite these problems, the EU is taking an increasingly assertive role. It worries that the policy void is fuelling religious tensions that are spilling over dangerously into Western Europe - as shown by a rash of arson attacks on synagogues in France this week. As a result, transatlantic positions that seven months ago were in step because of September 11 are now widening by the day. The US has acquiesced in the Israeli invasion of Palestinian-controlled towns after the Palestinian suicide bombings in Israel, and has paid only lip service to Yasser Arafat as a player in the search for peace. In contrast, the EU has declared Arafat to be the Palestinians' legitimate representative and its "interlocutor" in any negotiation. EU foreign policy supremo Javier Solana defiantly described Arafat, surrounded by Israeli forces in Ramallah, as a prisoner. He said the Palestinian leader had no control over suicide bombings commanded by Islamic groups such as Hamas and Islamic Jihad. "The situation will not be settled through the means being used now. A military operation is not going to resolve the conflict but, on the contrary, aggravate it," Solana said. In the past week, Egypt, Jordan and Syria have sounded out the EU on taking a firmer role in the conflict, while Russia has sent its foreign minister to confer with Spain, the EU president. The EU's executive commission has sent a peace envoy to the region - one of four, along with representatives from the US, Russia and the United Nations - to try to defuse tension. And it has pointedly announced that the EU would continue to provide budgetary help worth €10 million ($20 million) per month to Arafat's beleaguered Palestinian Authority to help meet civilian expenditures. What has caused the EU-US rift to widen? President George W. Bush's view of the world. In an interview published in the daily Liberation, French Prime Minister Lionel Jospin said he regretted that since September 11, the Americans "instead of toning down their initial, unilateralist reflex have in fact emerged with a vision of the world that is even more Manichaean (black and white) than before". In the Middle East, Jospin said, "the fear that the situation could spiral out of control prompts the US to act quickly to lower the tension, but without the wish to exert sufficient pressure on the Israeli Government". Bush's attempts to rally support for an offensive against Iraq, one of the "axis of evil" along with Iran and North Korea, have similarly made no headway on this side of the Atlantic. Pascal Boniface, head of the Institution of International Relations and Strategic Studies, said that in France at any rate "the US today is perceived as a problem, not a solution". Articulating Europe's dismay is, however, different from taking steps to intervene. The EU's biggest national Governments are divided as to how far to tread a different line from Washington. Many policymakers shrug when asked what the EU can do. The EU's biggest weapon - economic sanctions against Israel - is considered impractical. "The Germans would walk straight out of the room if anyone suggested it," said one diplomat. << nzherald.co.nz

To: Elsewhere who wrote (23222)	4/3/2002 2:40:18 PM
From: Ilaine	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

>>Europe and US split on solution The allies are divided over what action to take to defuse the conflict. Europe wants Israel to pull out of Palestinian towns. The US says the occupation is necessary to fight terrorists.<< More at: bangkokpost.com

To: Elsewhere who wrote (23222)	7/14/2002 9:30:44 PM
From: Elsewhere	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

The main question is how to offer Arafat a face-saving way out which supposedly is important in the Arab world. Maybe this could be done by a republican constitution with a chancellor and a president; then Arafat could be promoted from "general" to "president" That's what I wrote back in April - and it is a plan which Powell is pursuing now: msnbc.com Powell’s Plan: President Arafat—Without Powers An exclusive look into the White House plans for the Middle East By Michael Hirsh and Roy Gutman NEWSWEEK July 22 issue — Yasir Arafat’s future is on the table—and, the White House hopes, out of his hands. George W. Bush’s wish to be rid of the Palestinian leader will be among the topics in key talks this week in New York and Washington between Secretary of State Colin Powell and European and Arab officials. NEWSWEEK HAS LEARNED that Powell is encouraging the drafting of a plan that would give the Palestinians a state while moving Arafat into a figurehead presidency with limited powers. ...