SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Zeev's Turnips - No Politics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jim@Inland who wrote (46649)4/3/2002 10:00:38 PM
From: Zeev Hed  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 99280
 
It could be, but I would rather look at QLGC recent pattern as a second double top, just like the one we got in early December and January at around $56/57, now we have one at $51/52, and like the first one, the second top gave a fake breakout, which was aborted, if that analysis is a correct depiction of the pattern, one should expect $35 to be at least tested and possibly breached within two three months. Actually, if you look at the trio QLGC, BRCD and EMLX, they have similar structure, with QLGC being the stronger, BRCD double top not making it to the first top, and EMLX, actually, the weaker, the second top being quite far from the first.

Zeev



To: Jim@Inland who wrote (46649)4/3/2002 10:20:38 PM
From: jjstingray  Respond to of 99280
 
That pattern sure looks like an inverted head and shoulders. Although, I don't think I would want to be long right now in this market.



To: Jim@Inland who wrote (46649)4/3/2002 10:46:30 PM
From: TREND1  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 99280
 
Jim
The QLGC H&S has two problems.IMHO
(1) Incorrect vol pattern.
(2) Did not happen after big drop.

Larry Dudash


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News