Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Twin Mining (formerly Twin-Gold) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: VAUGHN who wrote (419)	4/4/2002 2:31:59 AM
From: russet	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 613

Vaughn, I could say exactly the same thing about you except you come from the tout side. It is clear you want very much to discredit me, but somehow the market senses you are wrong about TWG for now. This is what frustrates you. At $0.80 you pounded the table and said TWG couldn't fail,...you were going to average down and basically said everyone who wasn't was stupid not to as the share price was dropping and this was a gift. Someone doesn't believe you and is selling large quantities of shares to depress the stock. Re ground conditions: The ground conditions of the rock are described as fractured and they had problems drilling initially. This comes from an NR as well as the student geologist I talked to that did some of the indicator mineral work and sample collecting and presented his findings to the PDAC last year. Permafrost can't save all mines if the rock is really fractured and brittle. I'll wait for the mining engineers report, if we get that far to determine if you are right, or my guess is. You have also described this play as a near sure thing, they would use an neighboring existing mines old equipment, even though it wasn't a diamond mine, and dig up and process as cheaply as the South Africans do. What papers and experts did you use to figure that one out? Most of your posts on TWG are guesses, postulations, and it seems misrepresentations. Much of what I said has turned out to come to pass. If I haven't got the faintest idea what I'm talking about, then neither have you,...but if the source of the DMS plant cutoffs and yields are what you want,...they are the same source as Kaisers at the same convention. Stan Deakin from Deakin and Associates, Perth Australia/Plymouth UK,...they are the experts De Beers are using to model grades at Snap Lake and Fort a la Corne in Sask. They also use microdiamonds to model the grades at Argyle for Rio Tinto. They are the ones that said diamonds smaller than 3 mm sieve are not retained well by the average DMS plants. They even had graphs that you can get if you write to them I'm sure. Something else you are wrong about,...my being short. I'm long a small amount of DMX hoping for a boost from FDA acceptance and possible partnering announcements although I'm pessimistic on long term Pennsaid revenues, and I'm looking for an opportunity to get back into TWG after the financing. So to finish, let me rewrite your post and throw it back at you,...if you don't like my contrasting viewpoint, press ignore,.... Message #419 back at VAUGHN from his at Apr 3, 2002 11:51 PM Vaughn Would you take a breather from trying to fulfill your bullish expectations. Post some facts. Your "guesses,” postulations and misrepresentations are tiresome. (You have been ridiculed off the DMX thread - in your mind perhaps Vaughn, actually I left because no one wanted to discuss possible problems with Pennsaid and DMSO and possible side effects,... notice its price has gone down over 20% since), are we now to suffer through an endless series of your pointless positive bafflegab. If you just can't resist sharing your divine insights with the rest of us poor misguided fools, at least post some facts that you can substantiate, not "guesses!" You quoted some data. OK, we know from your previous posts that you haven't got the faintest idea of what you're talking about, so at least post your source for the data you quote. Is there a URL, an author and article we can find, or did these numbers come to you while you were ruminating on the throne. If you advise people to throw out numbers when making their analysis then be fair, suggest that they make sure the comparison pipe samples that are used also had their .2mm< stones excluded.- you got it now You seem to love Hermann so much, you'll do or say anything.