Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Stock Attack II - A Complete Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Secret_Agent_Man who wrote (33745)	4/4/2002 10:03:30 AM
From: Trading Machine	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 52237

CT, I would like to second that kudo although I don't think it is necessary. As a devout lurker I see OJ and others make calls without addressing whether or not they panned out later. Few traders go back and openly critique their own calls. For the most part we all recognize that even though the calls are stated in somewhat unequivocal terms, they are all really IF-THEN-ELSE statements. Experienced traders know that there are no absolutes in this business and I for one don't need someone saying overtly that "I bummed that one". I suspect that the folks out there that blindly follow other peoples calls without understanding the underlying environment get upset and want some accountability when the market goes against the call. Taken to the limit, most folks making calls will then start to hedge them to a greater or lessor degree. After a while they get watered down so much they don't mean much to anyone. gggg There's nothing wrong with being wrong unless you're AJC. VBG! So OJ, keep up the good work, your point of view is always refreshing and read by myself at least. Good luck to all Paul K.