Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JEB who wrote (245357)	4/4/2002 1:36:43 PM
From: craig crawford	Respond to of 769670

>> Third parties haven't worked. Why not take control of one of the big two? << well i agree with this idea rather than just blindly voting republican, which you advocated earlier. i don't have a problem voting for a republican (like an alan keyes), but i do have a problem with blindly voting republican just because democrats are even worse. i don't believe in voting for republicans who compromise their principles just because they are the lessor of two evils. for example, i will not vote for a republican who is pro-abortion simply because i do not want the blood of innocent children on my hands and on my conscience. i don't care if both the democrat and the republican candidate are both pro-abortion, i will not vote for either. i would rather write in my vote than have that on my conscience. Fateful time for America Message 16674775 I, for one, would rather merely watch the triumph of evil in sorrow than be implicated in helping bring about that triumph...I'd rather stand for what's right -- even if that cause temporarily loses -- and wake-up the day after an election knowing that my soul is still in God's hands. That's an infinitely better course than to compromise what's right, lose anyway, and wake-up after an election having neither victory nor God's favor.