Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : ahhaha's ahs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DMaA who wrote (4180)	4/4/2002 2:34:16 PM
From: ahhaha	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 24758

Who said it was "protection"? Asking for higher prices is what anyone should do. That's part of the free market mechanism. If you wish to look at the steel tariffs as protectionism, then I would say that such protectionism should pretty much eliminate the remainder of the steel industry in the US. My only interest at this juncture would be to ensure that the steel workers of the past have covered pensions. If tariffs, "protectionism", accomplish that, then I'm all for the tariffs in steel. Don't be someone who finally has learned to talk the talk without fully understanding when protectionism is destructive. In general, it is deemed humane to protect the very young and very old. This moral consideration has no impact on economy.