Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: BigBull who wrote (23514)	4/4/2002 6:58:29 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Can you make any sense out of these latest statements from the PA? Exactly which of Bush's statements does Arafat agree to "unconditionally?" That's easy. The ones that tell the Israelis to stop shooting and withdraw.

To: BigBull who wrote (23514)	4/4/2002 8:01:46 PM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Saeb Erekat said Bush's harsh criticism of Arafat was unjustified and unacceptable.'' The fella should just shut up and be grateful that Bush has held back from using even stronger language based upon the discovery that Arafat actually signed the approval letters for paying for those bomb making materials. And I hope that no one believes that what has thus far been released is all there is.. The Israel's likely have FAR MORE documented evidence of Arafat's direct involvement in the terror campaign, as well as not negotiating peace in good faith. Arafat best not miss this peace train... Because it's pulling out and if he doesn't the proper ticket, he's going to be left behind (as well as politically destroyed). And I think Zinni is planning on telling Arafat just that... Make a decision.. peace on less than perfect terms, or the US will permit the Israel's to continue cleaning house, justified by, as yet, unreleased documentation implicating Arafat even deeper in terror. Hawk