SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Leap Wireless International (LWIN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: arun gera who wrote (1870)4/5/2002 1:47:08 PM
From: pcstel  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2737
 
Were the previous covenants also for the Cricket part of the business? Does it imply that Leap is meeting the loan covenants requirements by merely moving G&A expenses and not really trying hard to lower G&A and other costs?

It is my understanding that the previous EBITDA to Cash Interest Expense covenants were for LWIN as a whole. I believe the new EBITDA to Cash Interest Expenses covenants that have been extended by 90 days are also for LWIN as a whole. But, with the addition of the Cricket only EBITDA metrics.

Overall G/A has been one of my biggest complaints. I think Q4 had about 10-12 million of one time launch expenses included! In operational mode, I expect to see overall G/A around 40 million.

The 9 million a quarter in non-Cricket G/A is worth noteing. Again, I attribute it to the upcoming launch of data services. Several people have disagreed with me. But, I think we will see a seperate operational segment for data! I believe data will share store fronts, infrastructure (for both the fixed, and air interface) and will become accountable for it's share of G/A expenses by Y/E. And it appears that management wants to measure Cricket performance as a stand alone segment. So I believe we will see another operating segment when data launches.

Looking at LWIN's CapEx for this year. The large amount of CapEx slated for Nortel tells us the story here. It is my estimation that Nortel has only built (voice wise) Toledo, Buffalo, and Syracuse.

The Lakeland protection build was performed by Lucent. So in my opinion, Nortel will be doing all of the Data deployments in selected markets. Nola seems confused about the CapEx for 02. The answer is obvious by the announcement of use of expected CapEx via NT this year (~240 MILLION by Y/E)!

So I believe a portion of the Corporate G/A not assigned to Cricket is in part due to the upcoming launch of Data!

When the data segment begins to defray Operation Expenses from Cricket. Then Crickets EBITDA should really shine.

IMO.

PCSTEL



To: arun gera who wrote (1870)4/5/2002 7:13:32 PM
From: pcstel  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2737
 
arun: PJ's report posted on the Yahoo board indicates that the ratios and benchmarks to be met by Leap relating to EBITDA are only for the Cricket business and do not include the 9.5 M/Qtr of non-cricket G&A.

Here is what the 10-K states.

"Prior to the March 2002 amendments, the vendor credit agreements provided that the consolidated EBITDA to cash interest ratio for the four fiscal quarters ending December 31, 2002 could not be less than 1.0 to 1.0, and the total indebtedness to annualized EBITDA ratio as of any date during the period from January 1, 2003 to March 31, 2003 could not exceed 10.0 to 1.0. The first measurement dates for the consolidated EBITDA to cash interest ratio and the total indebtedness to annualized EBITDA ratio were December 31, 2002 and January 1, 2003, respectively.       The March 2002 amendments delay the effect of the consolidated EBITDA to cash interest covenant so that it is first measured at March 31, 2003 and requires the ratio of consolidated EBITDA to cash interest to be not less than 1.3 to 1.0, 1.4 to 1.0, 1.5 to 1.0 and 1.9 to 1.0 at the end of the first, second, third and fourth quarters of 2003, respectively, and not less than 3.0 to 1.0 at the end of the first quarter of 2004 and thereafter. The March 2002 amendments also delay the initial measurement of the total indebtedness to annualized EBITDA covenant (and define the measurement date to be at the end of each quarter) so that this ratio now is first measured at June 30, 2003 and requires Cricket Communications and its subsidiaries to have a ratio of total indebtedness to annualized EBITDA no greater than 10.0 to 1.0, 7.0 to 1.0 and 5.5 to 1.0 in the second, third and fourth quarters of 2003, respectively, and no greater than 5.0 to 1.0 at the end of the first quarter of 2004 and thereafter. The maximum capital expenditures that Cricket Communications is allowed to make in 2002 were also increased by $60.0 million. Because the March 2002 amendments delay the initial measurement of the EBITDA covenants described above, we agreed to a NEW minimum consolidated EBITDA covenant that requires Cricket Communications, its subsidiaries and the subsidiaries of Leap that hold wireless licenses used in Cricket Communication’s business, to have consolidated EBITDA not less than negative $27.0 million, $0 and positive $9.0 million at the end of the second, third and fourth quarters of 2002, respectively, and positive $45.0 million at the end of the first quarter of 2003. We also agreed not to build out or launch any new markets until after June 30, 2003, other than markets included in our 40 Market Plan. Under our current business plan, we expect to meet these and all remaining covenants through the end of 2003.

So it appears that consolidated EBITDA to cash interest covenant remains unchanged in what metrics of the company it is measured against. While the total indebtedness to annualized EBITDA covenant is modified to include only those metrics of Cricket Communications.

PCSTEL