Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : War -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Machaon who wrote (13290)	4/5/2002 3:18:17 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 23908

Well, then what type of chemicals, or poisons, do you think that the Arabs were trying to spray on American cities, if not Anthrax Yes, arabs could certainly have used anthrax, but the choice of targets seems very unlikely for Al Qaeda -- Dan Rather? Sen. Dascle? Does Al Qaeda have a thing about Democrats?

To: Machaon who wrote (13290)	4/5/2002 3:20:46 PM
From: average joe	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 23908

"Well, then what type of chemicals, or poisons, do you think that the Arabs were trying to spray on American cities, if not Anthrax. The Arabs definitely were trying to get their hands on crop dusters." I'm sure they would have loved to spray anthrax with gleeful abandon if they could work out the details. "It is also well known that Iraq, and other terrorist nations have supplies of Antrax. If you feel that the Arabs decided not to use their vast resources of Antrax, why not?" They're innocent until proven guilty. As far as Iraq goes the U.S. should level Baghdad for other reasons. Blaming the Arabs for everything is as bad as every conspiracy bug blaming the Jews for everything.