Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Semi Equipment Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Donald Wennerstrom who wrote (2649)	4/5/2002 7:07:53 PM
From: Donald Wennerstrom	Respond to of 95622

Here is the weekly SOX table. Three of the stocks are up, 14 are down. The index is down 4 percent for the week. 3/29/02 4/5/02 FST CALL NEXT FST CALL CLOSE CLOSE PERCENT NXT YR YEAR LNG TRM SYMBOL PRICE PRICE CHANGE EARN PE GROWTH PE/G XLNX 39.86 40.28 1 0.50 81 25 3.22 TXN 33.10 33.42 1 0.71 47 20 2.35 ALTR 21.87 22.00 1 0.48 46 26 1.76 LSCC 17.53 17.37 -1 0.52 33 25 1.34 INTC 30.41 30.05 -1 1.01 30 17 1.80 KLAC* 66.50 65.63 -1 1.30 50 25 2.02 MXIM 55.71 54.46 -2 1.05 52 25 2.07 MOT 14.20 13.80 -3 0.39 35 15 2.36 AMAT* 54.27 52.40 -3 1.32 40 23 1.76 NSM 33.69 32.26 -4 0.28 115 19 6.06 LLTC 44.22 41.68 -6 0.81 51 25 2.06 TER* 39.43 37.00 -6 0.31 119 20 5.97 LSI 17.00 15.85 -7 0.50 32 20 1.59 NVLS* 54.14 50.28 -7 1.12 45 25 1.80 AMD 14.71 13.50 -8 0.69 20 15 1.30 BRCM 35.90 32.60 -9 0.53 62 40 1.54 MU 32.90 29.85 -9 1.88 16 20 0.79 TOTALS 605.44 582.43 -4 13.40 43 SOX-X 595.24 572.62 -4 COMPQX1845.35 1770.03 -4 *In Semi-Equip Group

To: Donald Wennerstrom who wrote (2649)	4/5/2002 7:10:24 PM
From: Donald Wennerstrom	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 95622

Here is the weekly SOX table. Three of the stocks are up, 14 are down. The index is down 4 percent for the week. 3/29/02 4/5/02 FST CALL NEXT FST CALL CLOSE CLOSE PERCENT NXT YR YEAR LNG TRM SYMBOL PRICE PRICE CHANGE EARN PE GROWTH PE/G XLNX 39.86 40.28 1 0.50 81 25 3.22 TXN 33.10 33.42 1 0.71 47 20 2.35 ALTR 21.87 22.00 1 0.48 46 26 1.76 LSCC 17.53 17.37 -1 0.52 33 25 1.34 INTC 30.41 30.05 -1 1.01 30 17 1.80 KLAC* 66.50 65.63 -1 1.30 50 25 2.02 MXIM 55.71 54.46 -2 1.05 52 25 2.07 MOT 14.20 13.80 -3 0.39 35 15 2.36 AMAT* 54.27 52.40 -3 1.32 40 23 1.76 NSM 33.69 32.26 -4 0.28 115 19 6.06 LLTC 44.22 41.68 -6 0.81 51 25 2.06 TER* 39.43 37.00 -6 0.31 119 20 5.97 LSI 17.00 15.85 -7 0.50 32 20 1.59 NVLS* 54.14 50.28 -7 1.12 45 25 1.80 AMD 14.71 13.50 -8 0.69 20 15 1.30 BRCM 35.90 32.60 -9 0.53 62 40 1.54 MU 32.90 29.85 -9 1.88 16 20 0.79 TOTALS 605.44 582.43 -4 13.40 43 SOX-X 595.24 572.62 -4 COMPQX1845.35 1770.03 -4 *In Semi-Equip Group

To: Donald Wennerstrom who wrote (2649)	4/6/2002 8:12:14 AM
From: cordob	Respond to of 95622

Hi about the table viewing, I am also usually on netscape 4.78 ot 6.0 (switching over) and see the tables perfectly aligned. Now looking at this table (post 2649) with IE5.0 and it seems to be OK. Cheers Cor

To: Donald Wennerstrom who wrote (2649)	4/6/2002 8:18:44 AM
From: cordob	Respond to of 95622

In my previous post I reported good tables with IE5.0 for this one (#2649), now I have reduced my screen setting from 600x800 to 640x480 and the table becomes a mess below the entry for TER (the next line is different from others) Strangely though when I am posting this message, the message I am replying to below is shown correctly (checked again by opening a 2nd window and getting the post it is mutilated in IE5.0 with 640x480) I am now not sure whether is was Ok before in IE5.0 with 600x800 and cannot check before posting this. Will be back. ======= This is where the edit feature of SI is great:) Back to 600x800, there are errors in alignment in IE5.0. The exact problem seems to be with the negative numbers, which get shifted two places to the right. e.g. the -1.90 in the WFR line is shifted 2 places right, whilst the 20 later in that line is correctly aligned. I am going to try and dig a bit deeper. Would be interested if Gottfried who posted about IE6.0 Message 17293141 sees this particular table OK too?? Cheers Cor