SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (143929)4/5/2002 6:25:16 PM
From: SilentZ  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1578295
 
>"But now," said Mr. Abu Samhadanah, the Fatah commander, "we are not going to arrest them."

AND FATAH IS THE RULING PARTY IN THE TERRITORIES!

>Mr. Shanab said: "We disagree with Fatah on the legitimate right of return of our refugees and many other things.

They disagree because most of the Arab leaders agreed in the '70s that the refugee issue was the one they would use to gradually destroy Israel. However, Hamas doesn't want a gradual destruction, it wants it now. Arafat has partnered with these people- why is Bush still trying to work with him?

-Z



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (143929)4/5/2002 7:36:01 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1578295
 
Bombers Gloating in Gaza as They See Goal Within Reach: No More Israel

(Just in case you forgot how urgent the situation is, or how unburdened the terrorists really are.)

nytimes.com (free registration required)


Ten, the above headline is a joke and an embarrassment if the NYT international edition is of the same stature and quality as the US publication. I would expect such an incendiary heading on a Nat. Enquirer paper but not the NY Times.

In fact, the whole article is incendiary and not intended to inform as is the role of journalism but to agitate the already existent fears and hate of the Israelis. Its very sad.

ted