Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Solon who wrote (7317)	4/5/2002 9:50:53 PM
From: Lazarus_Long	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21057

And THAT was pretty good too! Certainly, it is not for Neo to define the acceptable latitude of expression, and I found that whole detour somewhat annoying. It appears to me that that is precisely what is being attempted and I find it annoying. I do not and will not accept it.

To: Solon who wrote (7317)	4/9/2002 5:13:16 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21057

"Certainly, it is not for Neo to define the acceptable latitude of expression, and I found that whole detour somewhat annoying." It seemed to me that Neo and Kholt were merely trying to define a line that once crossed would constitute an offense or breach of decency; and not to impose any limits upon line hoppers. In some instances I would advocate for provocation; wherein I would also see the act as a breaking of waves created by others...and likely crossing such a line.