SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : HDTV: Television of the future here now -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Dennis Roth who wrote (50)4/17/2002 9:16:24 PM
From: cordob  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152
 
I wonder if this new Philips product impacts on HDTV or just on "mainstream TV"

see:

philipssemiconductor.com

Philips Goes All-Digital for Enhanced TV

100Hz Nexperia chipset can be used with both Analog and Digital Transmission


Cheers
Cor



To: Dennis Roth who wrote (50)5/6/2002 8:49:50 PM
From: Ron  Respond to of 152
 
Cable Companies Commit to Speed Digital TV
By Jeremy Pelofsky
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The top 10 U.S. cable operators committed on Wednesday to take steps to accelerate the transition to digital television, including carrying several high-definition digital channels by January 2003.

Federal Communications Commission Chairman Michael Powell last month set out a voluntary plan to give a push to the transition that has become mired in squabbling among broadcasters, cable providers and electronics manufacturers over what step should be taken first and by whom.

The cable industry is widely seen as a linchpin to the move to higher-quality, crisper digital television because so many Americans watch television via cable. However, consumers have been reticent to buy expensive equipment to receive digital, and available high-definition programming is limited.

The slow pace has caught the attention of some in Congress who are contemplating legislative moves to get the parties going. The move by the cable industry could serve to put the attention on programmers and electronics manufacturers.

"The cable industry's initiative, together with the voluntary actions of other industries as suggested by Chairman Powell, should provide an important boost to the DTV transition," Robert Sachs, president of the National Cable & Telecommunications Association, said in a letter to Powell.

"The success of the DTV transition depends upon the creation of compelling digital programming, the cooperation of the broadcast, cable, satellite and consumer electronics industries, and most importantly, consumer demand," he said.

The industry is hoping that the steps will push the broadcasters to air more digital programming, force consumer electronics manufacturers to sell digital-ready television sets and challenge satellite television providers for customers.

The commitment comes on the day the bulk of television stations were required to begin broadcasting in digital, however the FCC received 842 requests for a six-month extension and 530 have been granted so far.

CABLE COMMITS TO POWELL PLAN

Cable operators like AT&T Broadband and AOL Time Warner Inc. said they would accept Powell's challenge to carry by Jan. 1, 2003, at no extra cost up to five digital channels that offer significant amounts of high definition programming in the top 100 markets.

That could include networks, public television stations, cable channels or other value-added programming.

Tracking Powell's plan, the cable companies also agreed to begin ordering the necessary set-top boxes with digital connectors and deploying them to customers as soon as they are available from manufacturers, likely by the end of 2003.

"I am pleased that the cable companies have embraced my challenge with solid commitments and I look forward to similar strides by the other industries in the coming weeks," said Powell in a statement.

Additionally, the industry will embark on an advertising campaign to market digital television and other value-added programming that may complement services to encourage consumers to buy the new television sets and order the new service.

Sachs said AT&T Broadband, AOL Time Warner Inc., Comcast Corp., Charter Communications, Cox Communications, Adelphia Communications, Cablevision Systems, Mediacom Communications, Insight Communications and CableOne all agreed to take the several steps.

Powell's plan also called on the major television networks and premium movie channels to air half of their primetime schedules in digital by the fall season and consumer electronics makers to put digital tuners into some new sets starting in 2004.

"I am hopeful that these commitments will lead to results," said Sen. John McCain, and the ranking Republican on the Senate Commerce Committee which has jurisdiction over such issues. "If significant progress isn't made in the DTV transition, then I will introduce legislation that will not be voluntary." TELEVISION BROADCASTERS PART

Already, two premium movie channels are broadcasting in high-definition, HBO and Showtime, while Viacom Inc.'s CBS network broadcasts its primetime schedule in digital and Discovery Communications plans to launch a high-definition channel in June that offers nature, science and history shows.

Walt Disney Co.'s ABC network plans to broadcast half of its primetime shows in digital this fall. But part of the problem is few Americans have shelled out the thousands of dollars to buy television sets that will receive the higher-quality signals.

"We're pleased the cable industry is moving toward carriage of digital broadcast signals," said Edward Fritts, head of the National Association of Broadcasters. "We look forward to the day when cable operators carry all digital broadcast signals in their entirety."

Local affiliates in certain markets were supposed to begin broadcasting in digital on Wednesday though about 75 percent of the 1,300 commercial stations will not because of problems, ranging from unavailable equipment to financial difficulties.



To: Dennis Roth who wrote (50)10/9/2002 8:45:06 PM
From: Ron  Respond to of 152
 
Bentonville, Ark. - Wal-Mart is going wide on DTV rolling it out to 1,500
> stores nationwide.
> After testing high-definition plasma and rear projection monitors in at least
> two Wal-Mart units in Arkansas and Florida, the world's largest retailer is
> preparing to roll out an assortment of HD and HD-ready sets.
> The selection will likely include six SKUs, including two HD plasma display
> panels (PDP) from Sanyo and four rear projection monitors from Philips and
> Thomson.
> Wal-Mart would neither confirm nor deny the rollout, but a source familiar
> with the plan told TWICE that preparations for the installations are currently
> underway. The units will be sold in more than half of the chain's 2,700
> discount stores and supercenters.
> The HD array is already in place at Wal-Mart's Rogers, Ark., supercenter,
> whose reconfigured CE department may serve as a template for the launch.
> According to retail analyst Aram Rubinson of Banc of America Securities, who
> recently visited the store, the assortment includes Sanyo's 32-inch and
> 42-inch PDPs, which are ticketed at $3,968 and $5,968, respectively.
> Among the rear projection units, the store is carrying a 52-inch RCA model for
> $1,688 and three Philips SKUs: a 43-inch for $1,584, a 46-inch for $1,654, and
> a 50-inch for $1,772.
> The store is also stocking an analog rear projection model and two direct-view
> digital TVs: a 32-inch Philips and a 36-inch RCA that are both retailing for
> $1,292.
> Bob Nocera, Philips digital television marketing VP, acknowledged that
> Wal-Mart is carrying two of his company's 4:3 rear projection HDTV monitors in
> the 43- and 50-inch screen sizes, and is 'experimenting' with other Philips
> models including some direct-view CRT DTV monitors in select locations.
> Nocera said he was unaware of any service or delivery programs that Wal-Mart
> was offering to support the line at this time, adding that at least initially
> DTV sets were sold on 'a cash and carry' basis, 'but in time that may change.
> I am unaware of their exact plans on delivery.'
> 'They seem to be taking HDTV seriously and are rolling out a high-definition
> signal to display models in a lot of their stores,' he continued. 'If you look
> at where the market is going, particularly in projection TV, analog has a
> limited lifetime. In a couple of years, basically all projection TV is going
> to be at least digital ready.'
> Nocera said Wal-Mart's pricing structure has been 'competitive with everyone
> else,' and not unusually low.
> Wal-Mart is testing some widescreen displays (including the Sanyo PDPs) in
> select stores, he added, but the Philips program thus far has been limited to
> models with conventional 4:3 screen sizes.
> 'Right now, as there is still a little gap in 4:3 and widescreen pricing --
> especially in picture tube products, the 4:3 models have a little more of a
> mass appeal,' Nocera said. 'But especially in projection TV, I can see that
> changing in the next couple of years.'
> Rubinson said the CE department in the Rogers, Ark. store is about 40 percent
> larger than that of a typical Wal-Mart supercenter, lending it a 'more open
> and accessible' look.
> Besides accommodating the new HD monitors, the additional square footage also
> provides for an expanded selection of video game hardware and software,
> notebook computers - including Sony's Vaio - and about 60 different TV SKUs in
> total, he observed.
> Wal-Mart's move into high-end TV follows Sears' rollout of plasma and LCD
> panels to more than 650 stores last month. While Wal-Mart's initial test store
> retails are in line with average street prices, industry observers are
> concerned that its entry into the high-margin category could ultimately prove
> disruptive.
> 'It's not the healthiest thing for our guys,' said Bill Trawick, president and
> executive director of the NATM Buying Corp.
> Still, Trawick took solace in the complexities of selling, shipping and
> installing HDTV, which are more readily managed by CE dealers than discount
> chains, he said.
> 'It's not a cash and carry item,' Trawick noted. 'It's not like buying a
> 13-inch TV. It's a category that requires salesmanship. I think Wal-Mart will
> have some issues selling that product.'
>



To: Dennis Roth who wrote (50)1/13/2003 8:09:18 PM
From: Ron  Respond to of 152
 
Silicon Image to benefit from HDTV - Thomas Weisel : Thomas Weisel says that based on the level of interest and number of vendors displaying high-definition TVs at the Consumer Electronics Show last week, it is clear that the migration to HDTV is imminent; firm believes BRCM and SIMG are among the best positioned to benefit from HDTV, as BRCM could see renewed growth in its set-top biz and SIMG's HDMI standard could prove to be a very important technology as HDTV gains acceptance.
-- from Briefing.com



To: Dennis Roth who wrote (50)4/3/2003 10:37:09 AM
From: Ron  Respond to of 152
 
Cable Firms Get Ready for Spread of HDTV

What's been holding back high-definition TV, promoted as the next big thing in home entertainment for more than 15 years?

Analysts have pointed to three things: the cost of the digital TVs needed to receive ultrasharp pictures, the lack of HD programming and the cable TV industry's reluctance to carry HD content.

Cable firms are key because they provide pay TV to seven out of 10 homes.

The good news is that retail TV prices are falling, more content is on the way, and cable TV firms are carrying a handful of HD channels in many markets.

Still, it's unclear when the HDTV market will take off. Only a few million U.S. households are equipped with pricey, HD-ready TV sets.

Robert Sachs, head of the cable industry's trade group, talks about recent developments in this interview.

IBD: Why are cable firms warming up to HDTV?

Sachs: HDTV became a bigger priority for cable about 15 months ago. That's when a number of (cable executives) were out at the Consumer Electronics show in Las Vegas. They saw that most of the displays featuring HDTV were using satellite as a signal source.

That probably caused them to think about expediting their plans in respect to launching HD services. They didn't want satellite to gain a competitive edge.

IBD: What are competitive advantages of cable vs. satellite?

Sachs: Both cable and satellite are now offering HD options to consumers. Because of its distribution technology, satellite is (generally) a national service. But with spot beam (technology), satellite also has the ability to target programming to particular markets. With that said, satellite companies carry local broadcast signals in only 50-60 markets.

One of cable's competitive strengths is that it is a local business. Cable companies in every market across the country today carry broadcasters' digital local signals, their analog signals. And they're carrying digital HD signals in an increasing number of markets.

IBD: Cable TV firms agreed to carry about five HDTV channels as part of voluntary rules set up by the Federal Communications Commission last year. How many cable firms will actually carry more than the five channels agreed upon?

Sachs: It really is a market-by-market determination. They need to see what the initial consumer response is to HDTV and how many HDTV channels fit with their overall programming mix.

IBD: Some cable firms are charging extra fees for HDTV channels while others aren't. The same is true for satellite TV rivals. What's going on?

Sachs: Business models are still evolving. Even within the same cable company, they might be trying different pricing models in different markets. Typically, operators aren't charging digital customers extra for HDTV beyond equipment costs - except where programmers are charging them more.

But there are different pricing models for equipment too. Cox, for example, in some of their markets has done deals with (retailer) Best Buy. In that case, consumers purchase the HD set-top box at Best Buy. Other operators are leasing equipment. There are a variety of arrangements.

IBD: The National Association of Broadcasters has complained that cable operators are carrying less than 10% of the nearly 800 local stations broadcasting digital TV. Are they correct?

Sachs: That's a misleading statistic for several reasons. Most broadcast stations that are on the air in digital are using the standard-definition format (with less picture quality than HDTV). They're simply broadcasting digital duplicates of their analog signal.

Cable customers are already receiving the same broadcast content with very good analog picture quality. What makes a dramatic difference is where a broadcaster is producing substantial amounts of HD programming opposed to standard-definition digital. HD is what offers consumers something more.

The challenge that cable operators face today is one of bandwidth. Even where they've rebuilt their systems, there's still only 200 megahertz of new bandwidth for digital services - digital video channels, pay per view, Internet access, cable telephony.

There's a finite amount of bandwidth. It's a question of what is the optimal way to allocate it.

Cable operators today are offering HDTV in systems passing 45 million homes - including 73 of the nation's top 100 markets. In more than half of those 73 markets, the package of high-definition programming supplied by the cable operator includes one or more local broadcast stations.

IBD: Didn't the NAB also complain that viewers in many markets couldn't watch the Super Bowl on ABC in HD format through local cable systems?

Sachs: You need to understand that some broadcasters are asking for additional compensation for cable carriage of their digital signal, which includes high-definition programming.

It wasn't a situation of cable operators blocking access. It's a question of whether ABC was seeking to charge them for carriage of their digital signals.

Where ABC affiliates make their HD broadcasts available at no additional cost for cable subscribers, I'm unaware of any situation where the cable operator has said no to carrying the signal.

IBD: What will influence whether HDTV becomes mainstream with consumers?

Sachs: The greatest factor today is the price of high-definition TV sets.

Until we see digital TV sets break the $1,000 price mark and get down to around $600, these sets are going to be beyond the reach of millions of consumers.

There's also a big need for more HD or other high-value digital content. It's great that HBO, Showtime and Discovery have HD offerings, that ESPN is going to be offering an HDTV channel in April, that Bravo and Cinemax have announced launches for later this year.

You're also starting to see regional sports channels, like Comcast SportsNet and MSG in New York with HD offerings.
-- excerpt from Investors Business Daily...