SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: andreas_wonisch who wrote (144210)4/8/2002 8:49:46 PM
From: Joe NYC  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1578534
 
Andreas,

There are basically two different ways IMO:
- fighting the methods of terrorism (money flow, camps, structures)
- fighting the roots of terrorism (poverty, ideology, economic and political situations)


I don't subscribe to the "root causes" theory. Some 80% of human race has some root cause to be terrorists. Yet, only a miniscule percentage actually are terrorists.

I think it comes down to ideology, indoctrination, and brainwashing. How do you fight this? The "root causes" theory will prescribe a bottomless pit where to throw the money with promise of results in a generation or two. That is obviously unacceptable, if the acts of terror continue (from the same source that we have been fighting).

If another large scale terrorist attack takes place, I think a second stage will involve attacking what _I_ think is the root cause - the religious fanaticism, and indoctrination that brainwashes people into committing thiese acts.

This IMO would involve shutting down these so called religious schools, mosques that are involved in this indoctrination. This is obviously a lot more controversial than starting a war 1000s of miles from the US shores.

But if the US leaves now after the work is apparently finished they forget about the second category. It should be ensured that Afghanistan can be rebuild and that they have a stable government. There are some positiv efforts already done in that regard but there's still much of work left.

If anybody is hoping that Afganistan will ever have a stable government, they should read some history books. It will never happen. One thing that could succeed is partition of the country along the ethnic lines with a loose confederation among them.

Joe



To: andreas_wonisch who wrote (144210)4/10/2002 12:19:26 AM
From: SilentZ  Respond to of 1578534
 
>The US is apparently concentrating on the first one. I think they should target both. The second won't allow for visible short-term success but will pay off much better in the long term IMO.

And my argument is that we have to do the first before doing the second. We destroyed the Taliban, now we're paying to build up the new government.

-Z