Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Z Best Place to Talk Stocks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Joe Stocks who wrote (39084)	4/8/2002 11:41:57 PM
From: BWAC	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 53068

<AOL today is much different than the AOL of 2 years ago. > Now I'll agree with that. But thats a good thing. AOL plus Time Warner makes a much stronger dominant company. And I have no idea why the "street" disagrees. Nor do I really care. The street goes off on both unimaginable buying and selling tangents fanned by those who have a bit of money and power. I know the disinformation parade has been out in full force on AOL. And that the logic is becomming flawed. AOL wasn't and isn't worth $300 Billion. Maybe not $200 Billion. More than likely more than $100 Billion though based on sum of parts. Feel free to go to their website and review the many varied brands and units. It will suprise you. How much is Sports Illustrated worth? Or Time? What is the value of just AOL? Of just Time Warner Cable? Of the music copyrights? Of the movie copyrights? On and on................. I don't care what they paid for TW cause they paid in some insane highly valued stock currency. What was it around $80? I forget.