To: Joe NYC who wrote (144260 ) 4/9/2002 11:36:51 AM From: tejek Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1576882 No, I am saying that it encourages more distrust and fear that potentially could lead to more violence. I forgot, you are of the opinion the Mid-East got into this pickle because people were just not working hard at this peace thing. You have been holding onto this false premise for a long time, and the article is perhaps too much of shock to you. Joe, sarcasm will get you no where with me. And yes the article blew me out of my PJs. <g>But as far as what is going on in Israel, it has exactly zero impact. They already know all this. Anyway, don't feel bad about being completely wrong about the whole situation. There are millions who subscribe to your point of view, which is that all international conflicts are just big misunderstandings, and if you let the diplomats, and even the world leaders just talk to each other, the misunderstandings will be removed, and there will be peace. Where did you see me say that? Where have I said getting to peace in the Middle East would be that easy? I have no delusions as to the difficulty but what's the alternative.....24/7 war? Is that what you want?The same applies here. You may remember the time I had a great laugh at Scumbria's list of Clinton interantional achievements, at the top of which was the peace process in Israel. It absolutely clear to me that it would fail, so now I can say "I told you so". So you think there is no hope for peace?Basically, the cause of conflict has not been solved / removed / addressed, and without that, all the coffees, teas, dinners, fruitless sessions, empty promises, disingenuous hand shakes, all are meaningless. If they put in 10 times as many hours, "worked" harder on the "peace thing", drank 10 time as much coffee, the result would have been exactly the same - zero, nothing. What do you think is the cause of the conflict? ted