Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Compaq -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lynn who wrote (96964)	4/9/2002 9:12:00 AM
From: Jerome	Respond to of 97611

I would expect that you are right, but even if this were to be the case Wally will find some other frivolous lawsuit to hold things up. His delay tactics are costing HWP millions.

To: Lynn who wrote (96964)	4/9/2002 12:10:30 PM
From: Night Writer	Respond to of 97611

If the final vote is determined before the trial date and it turns out that Deutsche Bank's votes were _not_ needed after all, will this be enough for the case to be dropped? I hate to say this. It might depend on the margin of victory. The theory being that if HP twisted Deutsche Bank's voting arm, they also twisted some other large arms. Elephant's arms are easier to twist then fleas. Many elephants are suppose to vote in the fleas best interest not the elephants. Some Elephants do not have fleas. The law may still frown upon twisting their arms because it may hurt the fleas. The law does this to protect the fleas because without fleas there would be fewer elephants. Of course, elephants aren't suppose to have arms in the first place. <G> NW