Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Joe NYC who wrote (144371)	4/9/2002 6:36:39 PM
From: AK2004	Respond to of 1576392

Joe re: I would say < 100%. Are you saying 0%? talking about blood rights is useless, it is almost like if Indians would decide to kick us out and we would have to go. Blood rights are theirs, after all. Arabs lived in that region for 2000 years and to tell them to get out of palestine because of the 2000-year old history would be unfair. So they do have the right, IMHO, on the land if peace can ever be achieved. I meant 0% if we would approach it from pure blood rights of what it was 2000 ago. But we should not argue it from blood rights point. All the way back to 1946-47, it was meant for Palestinians to have land. Regards -Albert