SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: 2MAR$ who wrote (8007)4/9/2002 9:11:22 PM
From: Dayuhan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 21057
 
Since social justice must evolve rather than be constructed its furtherance requires acceptance of the authority of tradition.

An interesting idea, though I can't say I agree. I would say that automatic acceptance of the authority of tradition is as dangerous as automatic rejection of the authority of tradition.

Change is necessary; every living society changes. The dynamic tension among conservative, liberal, radical and reactionary serves to regulate the pace of change and maintain it at a level appropriate to the society. All of these elements are essential. Any of them can be destructive if unchecked by the others.

Just my opinion, obviously.



To: 2MAR$ who wrote (8007)4/9/2002 11:30:23 PM
From: Solon  Respond to of 21057
 
I just stepped back, Mars, and have to leave right away. But I wanted to tell you that I went to bookmark your site...and it was already there! Do you know how many times this happens to me?! Like Osler recommended...I am learning to live life in day-tight compartments! <ggg>



To: 2MAR$ who wrote (8007)4/10/2002 11:50:23 AM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 21057
 
It is a pretty good site. I have a more complicated idea of the role of tradition, however. In the first instance, simple tradition is something one is advised to be considerate of in order to avoid unnecessary strife and cause a great deal of social disorientation. That has to do with what I have said about taking a more modest tack in contemplating social change, relying on persuasion and not having too many balls in the air. In the second instance, the hallowed elements of tradition help to secure allegiance to the community and its higher aspirations. Thus, for example, we invoke the Constitution and the Founding Fathers as icons, as much as anything else. In the third instance, tradition consists of a patrimony of great cultural products, human achievements to be passed on especially by those who succeed the authors. Thus, paintings by Michaelangelo, "The Iliad", "Othello", the pyramids, St. Peter's Basilica, "Discourse on Method", and "Les Demoiselles D'Avignon" are part of the patrimony of the West, although they are shared with all, just in the same way that the Chinese have a special interest in Imperial art, or the Cambodians in Angor Wat, but share them. Finally, in the last instance, tradition consists of the higher order ideas and institutions that have developed with experience and criticism over time, and reflect an ongoing project of improvement and civilization building. Unfortunately, in this last instance, the great civilizations of the East, especially Indian and Chinese, stagnated, whereas the West managed to progress. Therefore, there is a problematic relationship between the other senses of tradition and the last, encapsulated in the word "modernization", which pits foreign traditions against native traditions, in some sense, with a view to material improvement. A lot of the turmoil currently experienced in the world comes out of this inevitable cultural imperialism, and the trauma and resentment engendered by it. That is one reason why it is necessary not to force the pace of change, but allow non- Western, traditionalist societies some breathing space to adapt to the modern world........