Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (8230)	4/10/2002 3:37:37 PM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21057

It never even occurred to me that either smirked until others complained. Even now, although I know the look that offends, I cannot see why.......

To: Lane3 who wrote (8230)	4/10/2002 3:44:29 PM
From: Lazarus_Long	Respond to of 21057

particularly when the accompanying message is not palatable. Ah, but not palatable to whom? And why?

To: Lane3 who wrote (8230)	4/10/2002 4:22:07 PM
From: Bill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21057

<I would either ignore or read his speeches, so strong was my reaction to it.> That's the way I felt about Clinton and his speeches. Guess our political leanings have something to do with our ability to stomach these guys.

To: Lane3 who wrote (8230)	4/10/2002 4:24:19 PM
From: MulhollandDrive	Respond to of 21057

Well it's true that certain physical attributes can be off-putting.... Which makes it even more of a challenge for content to engage....Clinton never struck that chord with me. Such were his affectations.

To: Lane3 who wrote (8230)	4/10/2002 4:37:43 PM
From: jlallen	Respond to of 21057

What smirk? I have never seen a smirk on either father or son... JLA