SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (8245)4/10/2002 4:34:20 PM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 21057
 
The main point in dispute is whether he had the sneer. Probably can't settle it, but I didn't see it, and neither did Poet.......



To: Lane3 who wrote (8245)4/10/2002 4:59:37 PM
From: Lazarus_Long  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 21057
 
Except for his war. I didn't like his war.
I presume you mean the Gulf War instead of all the attempts Clinton made to deflect attention from his sexual peccadilloes. What was the problem with the Gulf War? Other than not finishing off Saddam.



To: Lane3 who wrote (8245)4/10/2002 6:44:56 PM
From: thames_sider  Respond to of 21057
 
I doubt that old New England families have hereditary facial features

If they've 'advanced' enough to have hereditary positions of power, why not the recessive mutations too? Just wait until the madness becomes overt...

<edit> OK, maybe you're there.
Appointing Ashcroft may well be symptomatic of late-stage porphyria. A tree would probably be less contemptuous of the Constitution... certainly less likely to sing durng an interview...
<edit2> and what about the Kennedy's?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News