SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Wyätt Gwyön who wrote (116536)4/10/2002 6:39:13 PM
From: pcstel  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 152472
 
i agree. i would rather pay apple to make sure it works. it is not worth the hassle of buying a system that requires a call to tech support.

I figured this one out about 9 years ago, while spending four days trying to install a CD ROM and sound card into a 386DX66. My youngest son bought a CD-ROM Game and wanted to play it. Could not get enough base memory to run the game and the mouse driver. Which the game required. I moved everything to HIMEM but was still 15kb short with my existing mouse driver. I spent 5 days asking friends for mouse drivers until I found one small enough. In the mean time, my son had taken the disk to a friends house and played it on a Mac. I started claculating how much my time was worth, and how much time I spent trying to make the PC do what I wanted to do.. I found out that the Apple was much cheaper, (and easier on the blood pressure), in the long run. For the consumer, the MacOS is unmatched. Now some fo there software titles which I use almost daily like (Final Cut, and DVD Studio Pro) with the Pinnacle CineWave card are just unmatched. Even by Avid!

Not that I think it is the Mac OS is the best OS out there. I give that award to SGI's (Unix derivative) IRIX. The XFS file system of IRIX goes unmatched! (Even though SGI released the XFS file system for Linux about a year ago).

And so it goes,
PCSTEL