SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Middle East Politics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (1431)4/10/2002 6:03:06 PM
From: Elmer Flugum  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 6945
 
Princeton University steps up:

princetondivest.org

Others:

matzpun.com

bismilah.com

womeningreen.org

inminds.com



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (1431)4/10/2002 7:12:59 PM
From: StormRider  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 6945
 
i would dispute the estimate of 1 million american casualties... nevertheless, it would have been military casualties NOT innocent civilians. i don't get that emotional when there are a lot of military casualties, because they chose to put their lives at risk to protect their country... whereas the killing of innocent civilians, no matter who they are (race, color, or creed), affects me emotionally.



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (1431)4/10/2002 8:20:47 PM
From: Emile Vidrine  Respond to of 6945
 
"You can make a good case that the two atomic bombs saved lives"

We could also make a case for dropping a few nukes on Tel Aviv, Haifa, Egypt, Syria, Saudi Arabia, Iraq and Iran might save a hundred million lives by circumventing the Jewish promotion of WWIII against all Arabs and Moslems!

Genocidal maniacs can always justify their murderous ambitions.



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (1431)4/12/2002 1:21:40 PM
From: Thomas M.  Respond to of 6945
 
No, you could make a weak case for that, and you would be shredded by all the experts at the time and afterwards.

Tom