Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mick Mørmøny who wrote (67136)	4/11/2002 6:35:30 PM
From: _scar_face_	Respond to of 74651

Shap done good, real good today, in highlighting what the defense has been saying all along during this portion of the case. He did it almost all by himself too. edit Guess that makes 32 witnesses for Msft.

To: Mick Mørmøny who wrote (67136)	4/11/2002 6:49:54 PM
From: David Howe	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 74651

Ok, MSFT bashers, explain this one. << Answered Shapiro, "I hadn't considered that before." While allowing he wanted more time to think about the problem, he said Microsoft could recover Explorer development costs by raising the price of Windows. "So you would raise the price of Windows for all consumers?" asked Lacovara. Shapiro responded that maybe the requirement to discount the browserless Windows should be reconsidered in light of the requirement to give away its source code. Responded Lacovara, "So they would not get a discount for the only piece of Microsoft middleware that was at issue in this trial?" >> WHAT A JOKE! The stinking competitors / states (same thing) have struck out now. Their so called remedy is a farce. It has nothing to do with consumers and everything to do with competitors. Anyone with half a brain can figure that out and I'd say that the judge is laughing at the states behind her poker face. IMO, Dave