Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: AK2004 who wrote (144762)	4/11/2002 11:20:57 PM
From: Joe NYC	Respond to of 1575767

Albert, I have to admit that those triangle graphs: khazaria.com confused the hell out of me. Ok (continuing a little bit later), I think I got the concept, but I think it is far fetched to draw any conclusion on these charts - in favor that Ashkenazi are related to biblical Jews, related to Turks, or independent of both. Your point about Russian being very distant could be because Russians have a Scandinavian influence, so if you look at it from this progression: Scandinavian - Russian - Generic Slavic vs. Turkic Could that explain it? Another thing to consider is the map was significantly different in 8th to 10th century from what it is now. The Eastern Slavs (lets forget western Slavs) lived mainly in a corridor between Kiev, Moscow and Novgorod, and to the south east the tribes where not Slavic, but Turkic. Eventually, Slavs conquered all of these tribes, and dominated the region, but that was after the fact. Joe