SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: LindyBill who wrote (24700)4/12/2002 5:48:46 AM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Nobody reads the "Times" editorials? here is a great review of there "attack" on Arafat over the last 7 months.

"Stupid White Men: A Selection of Editorial Commentary from The New York Times"

If You Don't Heed Our Warnings, We'll Warn You Again

The Idler has a hilarious compilation of New York Times editorials demanding that Arafat shape up or . . . face another editorial demanding that he shape up. We'd quote from it, but you really have to read the whole thing to get the effect.

the-idler.com



To: LindyBill who wrote (24700)4/12/2002 7:45:18 AM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
World finally gets glimpse of refugee camp devastation

news.independent.co.uk



To: LindyBill who wrote (24700)4/12/2002 9:35:19 AM
From: JohnM  Respond to of 281500
 
The WSJ lead Editorial for today

Ah, so there is one person who can read the WSJ editorials without cracking up, without just rolling on the floor, laughing tears rolling out of the eyes; wondering yet again, how a reasonably good newspaper, with a great investigative journalism staff, got stuck with these . . .

On the NYT editorials, remind me, sometime, to tell a few Howell Raines' stories. One of my brothers spent some time with him a couple of weeks ago. None are repeatable here.