Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Gottfried who wrote (62846)	4/12/2002 3:42:49 PM
From: Kirk ©	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 70976

This looks like the AMAT thread to me... R U lost? :) Kirk

To: Gottfried who wrote (62846)	4/12/2002 4:57:38 PM
From: Sam Citron	Respond to of 70976

OT FDT Threadmeister Gottfried, Thanks for the reminder. I assumed that OT was a bit redundant, since any post not beginning with a stock symbol could be assumed to be OT on your thread. Hope these comments during market hrs. are not thought of as pollution. Anyway, I will be happy to comply with the OT label convention. Sorry I have not been churning my portfolio fast enough to meet my quota. I'll see if I can make up for it by the end of the month. <g> Sam

To: Gottfried who wrote (62846)	4/12/2002 9:55:58 PM
From: nnillionaire	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 70976

Gottfried, As one who has read every message on this AMAT board since times when you posted with your first AND last names (and so did I), I thank you for your request for the OT posting request. AMAT is my largest holding, and I want to follow every post on the thread, as I have since 1996. However, I work for a living, and when the SI AMAT thread includes trades and OT posts, it is very difficult to follow the thread while at work. I am pleased that AD, Sam, et al formed another thread to talk about s.t. trades. OT posts that are not labeled "OT" are unconscionable. Good Investing