Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: David Howe who wrote (67201)	4/12/2002 4:20:54 PM
From: _scar_face_	Respond to of 74651

And look what that cost netted the "system".

To: David Howe who wrote (67201)	4/12/2002 4:26:13 PM
From: jonkai	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 74651

Sure, why not. I was first found guilty of reckless driving and DUI as well as speeding. The Appeals Court reversed the lower courts decision on all but the speeding ticket. you had better reread your rulings.... better yet, look at your stock price and compare it to when you said that it was "basing", the stock price is telling you about your future...... at least learn how to read this simple open book...... jon.

To: David Howe who wrote (67201)	4/12/2002 4:36:43 PM
From: nommedeguerre	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 74651

David, "The Appeals Court reversed the lower courts decision on all but the speeding ticket." And if they hadn't reversed the decision as is the case with the Microsoft case? What would you have expected as a "remedy" on a DUI and reckless driving, surely not a $50 fine. Microsoft has been found drunk at the wheel and reckless with their monopoly. If their remedy is a $50 fine I can live with that, if that is what the Judge decides the software market is worth. Can you live with a harsher remedy? Better get used to the way the System works Dave, it is beyond the power of this thread to change it. Cheers, Norm