Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Glenn D. Rudolph who wrote (141500)	4/12/2002 9:20:46 PM
From: H James Morris	Respond to of 164685

>>Do they really make those records public? << As long as the USA taxpayer picks up the tab those records are of public knowledge.

To: Glenn D. Rudolph who wrote (141500)	4/12/2002 9:53:13 PM
From: H James Morris	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 164685

To:Clam Clam who started this subject From: KeepItSimple Thursday, Jan 17, 2002 4:29 PM View Replies (8) \| Respond to of 141504 MSFT just reported GAAP numbers, but CNBC said "Ok, first call is telling us to ignore those numbers and go with a pro-forma figure that they've calculated." WHAT THE FUCK!!?!??!!??!?! Even if a company decides they won't mislead investors, CNBC and first call will refuse to use the GAAP numbers and instead figure out what the pro-forma numbers "should" be? Does anyone know what happened to integrity on wall street? Do they take investors for complete and utter idiots? This is the most ridiculous thing I've ever seen on CNBC. Even worse than the $1000 per share Qualcomm pimping analyst guest.. This officially takes the fucking cake! And no, I'm not short MSFT. Btw I think KIS has INSP 1 dollar calls, along with Jeff the INSP SI censor.