SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SilentZ who wrote (144867)4/12/2002 10:02:05 PM
From: AK2004  Respond to of 1572633
 
Z
re: he doesn't like violence on any side,

ok let's look at the post that I was talking about:

"Ten, part of Korea is yet to be liberated and the other part was liberated due to military intervention. And when you think of the literal meaning of terrorism....a military intervention probably pretty much fits that definition.

The Jews were liberated by the Holocaust which when you stop to think about it was also a form of terrorism."

It escapes me how can be considered a pacifist when the above response was to Ten's "the liberation of Korea came about without resorting to terrorism. The liberation of the Jews came about without resorting to terrorism."

-Albert



To: SilentZ who wrote (144867)4/13/2002 4:53:06 PM
From: tejek  Respond to of 1572633
 
No, he's not trying to pick a fight. He's doing the opposite. It appears to me that Ted's a pacifist, and he doesn't like violence on any side, and feels that it's never justified.

Z, I am not a true pacifist. I just believe in exploring all options, and leaving fighting as the option of last resort.

ted


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News