SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: AK2004 who wrote (144872)4/13/2002 3:36:34 AM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1572885
 
Albert, <he defended Andreas' point that terrorism is a matter of perspective.>

The only other perspective I can take is one that views terrorism as just another means of waging war.

If that's the case, then absolutely no one should complain when Israel responds with military might. Forget who's right or who's wrong, just let the Palestinians and the Israelis duke it out. The winner will get the legitimate claim to the holy lands, as well as the right to rewrite history in their favor.

Of course, that would go against the liberal viewpoint that war is always wrong, and all "evil" comes from the rich-n-powerful. But hey, when was the liberal viewpoint ever a logically consistent one? ;-)

Tenchusatsu



To: AK2004 who wrote (144872)4/13/2002 10:34:10 AM
From: SilentZ  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1572885
 
>"the systematic use of violence to create a general climate of fear in a population and thereby to bring about a particular political objective."

See, I think that that's party of what Israel is doing, and part of what America is doing... I mean, when you have a population in which many of the people actually do support the "evil" government, such as the population in Afghanistan and in the West Bank/Gaza, you do need to let them understand that doing so is not going to get them anywhere. Also, as long as you only directly attack the non-civilians for such a cause, it's fine.

Once again, perhaps there should be a better term than "terrorism".

-Z



To: AK2004 who wrote (144872)4/13/2002 5:10:40 PM
From: tejek  Respond to of 1572885
 
In fact that is exactly it...

search.britannica.com.

"the systematic use of violence to create a general climate of fear in a population and thereby to bring about a particular political objective."


Albert, you see; it took forever but in the end, we agree.

ted