Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: alexed who wrote (8740)	4/13/2002 1:00:10 PM
From: Poet	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21057

Hi alexed. I'm off to buy mulch, but just wanted to say hello. :-)

To: alexed who wrote (8740)	4/13/2002 1:16:28 PM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21057

Wasn't reproductive meant to produce extra body parts for the original?Is that why everyone is against it? Reproductive cloning is intended to produce a baby. I don't recall all the points of view, but I can tell you why I'm against it. Right now, all the clones that are born require hundreds of tries and hundreds of mistakes. The mistakes either are not born or are born deformed. Now they're saying that Dolly has premature arthritis and who knows what other hidden problem. Ain't no way I'm about to condone that for humans.