Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (8765)	4/13/2002 8:20:18 PM
From: Lazarus_Long	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21057

Dowd again, huh? Pardon me while I .... RETCH!!! Now that that's over.... Let's see, you women wanted power, money, careers, etc. so we gave them to you. The traditionalists warned you there would be costs and it wouldn't be a free ride. Now you're finding out there are costs and it isn't a free ride. And bitching about it. Impossible to satisfy. Male logic on dating down is bollixed up: Women who seem in awe of you in the beginning won't stay in awe once they get to know you. Yeah, right, we got it all wrong and you got it all right. It's all our fault. Typical Dowd unsubstantiated BS. Women who don't have demanding jobs are not less demanding in relationships; indeed, they may be more demanding. They're saving up all that competitive energy and critical faculty to lavish on you when you get home. Stereotyping. If men would only give up their silly desire for world dominance, the world would be a much finer place. Somebody's gotta run the planet, honey. Better if they're competent and experienced. Now, look at the bonobo. We aren't Pan, honey, we're Homo. Wanna know something? It never was a piece of cake on this side of the gender line either.