Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tcmay who wrote (77051)	4/13/2002 8:46:01 PM
From: niceguy767	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

tcmay: "Is that supposed to explain Engel's obsession? " Meaning, _what_, exactly? I have a hunch you are implying something about Paul Engel's orientation, but it would be best if you spelled it out...." Win's statement is wholly innocuous in comparison to the following, imo: "NiceGuy, you have seen fit to make things up and claim that I've said as much. If you insist in continuing to attribute things to me that I haven't said I will start talking about your disgusting behavior with little boys. It's illegal with minors and considered a perversion. I'd really rather not have to expose your proclivities so how about knocking off the lies? Find a quote if you want and if I said something I should be willing to defend it or admit I was wrong, but stop the lies. I'd really rather not go there." I must admit that I have long ago concluded that Elmer's and my ideologies/cultural upbringings or whatever, have zero common ground...but from my perspective, for Elmer, or anyone for that matter, to post the above, is a far more heinous violation of conduct than any that have heretobefore been posted...For Elmer to have to stoop to bring in, (what may be a thought proccupation of his for all I know), the absurd threat delineated above, is a reflection of a "hurting" individual...It is truly bizarre that if I were to call Elmer an idiot that I would be banned, yet Elmer can post the captioned, far more serious in content,imo, yet be allowed to continue posting in this vein...Elmer's post above may show his true colours...Not even a rainbow can extract him from this one!!! Make it so!!!

To: tcmay who wrote (77051)	4/14/2002 4:16:25 PM
From: Win Smith	Respond to of 275872

Well, actually, meaning that the particular anatomical associations you were making seems to correlate pretty well with siliconinvestor.com and siliconinvestor.com . Oddly, that particular shopworn terminology seems to have disappeared with Paul. And as far as suspensions go, I have, actually, been suspended, once for throwing some Intel guy's particular insulting word back at him, once for responding to baiting that the baiting Intel guy confessed to right away. Didn't go whining about it for months afterward, though. That would be an Intel thing to do. Well, months may not be quite the right time scale, the Intel whining about this thread has been ongoing since its inception, so years might be more appropriate.