Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elmer who wrote (77059)	4/14/2002 12:19:56 AM
From: milo_morai	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

Elmer <font color=red>insulting someone in the same post you claim to be sorry is not a apology. It's double talk. I voted for your suspension for back to back offensives. As well as TOU. M. Steve spoke the truth #reply-17328271 ldrc.com

To: Elmer who wrote (77059)	4/14/2002 9:41:39 AM
From: niceguy767	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

Elmer: "You lied when you accused me of leaking inside information about Intel yields and financials." Wrong again...but what else is new??? yet another example of, to quote you,: "Stupid is as stupid does..." (Check your facts before you begin to spew, elmer...you'll find someone else made that comment!!!)...Please spare me any apology though, elmer...(I know you'll somehow twist (in your own mind anyway) the above accusation to make it OK for you to have done so)... By the way, is your behaviour representaive of INTC employees? If so, it might provide some additional insight about INTC's precipitous performance decline over the past 3 years... And if it isn't, which I'm almost certain is the case, then perhaps you should be disciplined by INTC management for carrying on in such disgusting manner while acting on behalf of INTC...I think you are treading a very thin line carrying on in such a disgraceful manner yet making it clear that you are bearing INTC's flag...In any other large company that I know of, to characterize your behaviour as inappropriate would be a mild categorization...