SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (8900)4/14/2002 2:18:34 PM
From: marcos  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 21057
 
'I think you're being a little too dismissive of that' - wasn't my intention, only meant to point out that choices must be made by all ... not disputing that Dowd had made a valid point, i think she did, men and women are composed differently and there is gender determined role playing, that's a fact and will likely stay a fact for the foreseeable future imho ... individuals can fudge it one way or the other to varying extent and with varying degree of success, still vive le difference

'women had been lead to believe that they could have it all.' - nobody can, ever



To: Lane3 who wrote (8900)4/14/2002 2:46:12 PM
From: Lazarus_Long  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 21057
 
I think the bitterness in this, to the extent that the Dowd article demonstrates that, is that women had been lead to believe that they could have it all. Some of them bought it.
On behalf of my gender, I enter a plea of "Not Guilty".

Good try at obscuring the facts by use of the passive voice, but no seegar. The correct wording would be
"WOMEN led women to believe they could have it all."


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News