SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Middle East Politics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Brumar89 who wrote (1461)4/14/2002 10:29:16 PM
From: traderjml  Respond to of 6945
 
Tell me then, what country in the world, other than "Disputed-Territory-Palestine" is covered by settlements from another country?

Personally I feel that I live in occupied territory. Occupied native american indian lands. Except instead of refugee camps we call them reservations and give them casinos so they dont complain. Wait till they realize that they should start a suicide bombing campaign based on thier grievances, and maybe we should return 97% of america to the indians. Even Manhattan we only got because we swindled them for $24. On that note most of death row should be released and forgiven, because they had a tough life as well. I think the columbine killers felt isolated as well.



To: Brumar89 who wrote (1461)4/15/2002 1:17:12 AM
From: denizen48  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 6945
 
The settlements are the main obstacle to any imaginable peace. We all know American & World History, so don't come with fourth grade logic about our heritage. We know what we did. This is now. Even the English got out of Falkland, although they won the war. The age of colonialism is over. Now it's called land grab and occupation. This is 2002. I want to see world peace, not clean nuclear strikes. Sharon is a fool with a gun, not a world leader.