Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Srexley who wrote (247972)	4/15/2002 12:33:01 PM
From: Kenneth E. Phillipps	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

I don't object to the spending - just the deficit spending. If changed circumstances requires greater defense spending, the President should have the moral courage to ask the nation to sacrifice with greater taxes. He doesn't have the courage. He wants it both ways - greater spending and lower taxes. This jeopardizes future generations.

To: Srexley who wrote (247972)	4/15/2002 12:59:31 PM
From: gerard mangiardi	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

If Clinton left our country open to a terrorist attack, I would think the closing that door would have been the first priority of the bush gov not tax cuts and big oil mandating our energy policies.

To: Srexley who wrote (247972)	4/15/2002 9:48:56 PM
From: rich4eagle	Respond to of 769670

WRONG< CLINTON KEPT OUR COUNTRY SAFE, BUSH ALLOWED IT TO BE ATTACKED BY BEING ASLEEP AT THE SWITCH.

To: Srexley who wrote (247972)	4/15/2002 9:50:48 PM
From: rich4eagle	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

We don't need to spend more money on defense we already spend too much, unfortunately most of it wasted. 9/11 proves that it is wasted. What we need is less money spent on defense to restructure our forces to be lean and mean and PRECISION ACCURATE AND DEADLY.

To: Srexley who wrote (247972)	4/15/2002 9:52:15 PM
From: rich4eagle	Respond to of 769670

The Constitution of the US was for the people by the people and the premise was "FREEDOM" not defense and this Admin has destroyed freedom more than ever in the history of the US

To: Srexley who wrote (247972)	4/15/2002 9:54:29 PM
From: rich4eagle	Respond to of 769670

Clinton was fiscally responsible and quite efficient from any economic and monetary standard known to humankind, quite the opposite of the Bush Admin's TOTAL FISCAL IRRESPONSIBILITY, and the markets are reflecting this mismanagement.