SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lane3 who wrote (9028)4/15/2002 1:15:56 PM
From: one_less  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 21057
 
"Bush's position seems utterly Luddite to many..."

I didn't like his first comment a year ago where he suggested that we could live with the risks to human beings in order to advance science.

I don't think he feels a clear and solid perspective on this so maybe he is still bouncing around trying to find his niche.

I have some thoughts of my own but haven't formed a solid adherence to either political side of the cloning issue. And no sense getting in a hurry. The finger pointing at the religious right or the left wing radicals is a bad sign that makes me think we will struggle with it until judgement day.



To: Lane3 who wrote (9028)4/17/2002 5:52:37 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 21057
 
Bush's position seems utterly Luddite to many,

I'm not sure that Luddite would be the right word. Luddites where more in to destroying machines because they thought it threatened their livelihood. The technology of the machines that the Luddites destoryed wasn't even really new. It was more of a workers revolt against management. The following article calls it "open-eyed class warfare"

nytimes.com

Even if you take what the term luddite has come to mean (someone who is anti-technology) that wouldn't apply either, IMO.
________________

luddite.com

Sells computers over the internet so its hardly luddite, but the computers have wood cases.

Tim