Why do you presume it was wasted, stolen, etc.?
Take a look at this:
jewishworldreview.com
AFTER REPEATEDLY TELLING OVERBURDENED TAXPAYERS that there can be no tax cuts until "Social Security is saved,'' the Clinton administration has pledged to spend an extra $400 million in aid for the Palestinians. This decision is flawed for at least two reasons.
First, British aid directed at housing projects for needy Palestinians in Gaza was siphoned off and used instead to construct luxury apartments for supporters of Palestinian Authority leader Yasser Arafat, according to the Sunday Times of London. Asked about this, Secretary of State Madeleine Albright said that misspent British aid "is not an issue for the United States.'' Albright assured reporters that "every dollar (of U.S. aid) is accounted for and is completely transparent.''
Not exactly. A secret 600-page report last year by the PA's own auditing office found $323 million, nearly 40 percent, of the PA's annual budget had been wasted, stolen or misused. A December, 1995, General Accounting Office report said it was ``unable to independently verify (the Palestine Liberation Organization's) financial condition since the PLO was unwilling to provide us with requested accounting reports and supporting documentation.''
Arafat claims there has been a decline in the living conditions of Palestinians since the current "peace process'' with Israel began five years ago. He blames Israel because of its frequent border closures to curtail terrorism. But Arafat for more than 25 years has prevented outside aid, even in the refugee camps, in order to cynically manipulate world opinion against Israel and in favor of an independent Palestinian state.
The second flaw in the decision to sharply increase U.S. aid is the view held by this and previous administrations that Israel's enemies can be bought off and deterred in their unchanging objective to take all of the land for themselves. Even while accepting the new financial package, which totals more than $3 billion when other nations' contributions are factored in, Arafat repeated his promise to declare a Palestinian state with Jerusalem as its capital. He even referred to Jerusalem as "occupied territory.'' The status of Jerusalem and of any Palestinian entity is supposed to be reserved for talks on the final status between Israeli and Palestinian territory.
President Clinton is scheduled to go next week to the Middle East, where he will address a sham meeting of the Executive Committee and the Central Council of the PA. At that meeting, the PA supposedly will vote to repeal a section of the PLO Covenant calling for the destruction of Israel, which Arafat pledged to do at the agreement he and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu signed last October in Maryland. But the Palestinian media reveal that its side takes a different view of the forthcoming meeting from the United States and Israel.
According to the Middle East Media and Research Institute, the Arabic version of the Wye agreement (unlike the English) states the meeting to be addressed by President Clinton "will reaffirm the decisions of the Executive Committee and the Central Council regarding the amendment of the (Palestinian) Covenant.'' The Arabic version says it will be President Clinton, not the Palestinian side, who will "reaffirm his commitment to the peace process.'' No Palestinian reaffirmation is mentioned. Nor is any decision to abrogate part of the PLO Covenant. The head of the Palestinian negotiating team, Saib Ereiqat, said the meeting of the various Palestinian bodies "will convene to listen to Clinton, not to vote.''
Former U.N. arms inspector Scott Ritter told the Jerusalem Post Nov. 3: "The (Wye accord) is to be monitored by the CIA, but the real arbiter will be the State Department, and this is a cause for great worry. The entire effort has been politicized -- this is the Clinton administration's own Camp David, and they really can't afford to let it fail. Therefore they cannot be counted upon to be honest brokers.''
So, the Jews are again being sold out. In World War II, the U.S. wouldn't spend the money or the political capital to save Jews from the Nazis. Today it is spending the money, but giving it to Hitler's ideological descendants to help them finish the job. It is shameful and it won't work because the PA has made it abundantly clear to everyone, except those who will not see, that their ultimate objectives have not changed. Instead of achieving them through war and terror, which they so far have been unable to do, they will now win on the installment plan --- with the United States making the payments.
And take a look at this, too.
cdn-friends-icej.ca
INVESTING IN YASSER ARAFAT
(by Michael Kelly, WASHINGTON POST, Dec 2)
There was a wonderful moment in the annals of diplomacy this week. Yasser Arafat, the president of the Palestinian Authority, had come to town to attend an international conference convened by the White House to raise a new pile of money to give to President Arafat. And the conference had gone splendidly.
Everyone had behaved perfectly fine; no one had so much as mentioned the inconvenient London Sunday Times story the day before, which said that the Palestinian Authority had swiped $20 million in British aid intended to build housing for the poor of Gaza, using he money instead to build luxury flats for Arafat's military and bureaucratic elite. After a day of pleasantries, representatives of 43 nations had pledged $3 billion in new aid to the Palestinian Authority, including an extra $400 million from the U.S. president. Arafat saw that it was good. "I am satisfied with the reality of this conference," he pronounced.
The reality? The reality is this: Since July 1, 1994, the day that Yasser Arafat arrived to take charge of Gaza, the international community has given the Palestinian Authority about $2.5 billion in aid. In that time, to the confoundment of confident predictions, life in Gaza became, for most people, even more poor, nasty, brutish and short than it had been before the arrival of President Arafat. In the past four years, wage rates in Gaza have fallen 50 percent and unemployment has risen to highs of 50 percent; currently, it hovers at around 30 percent.
The gross national product per Palestinian has declined by 35 percent. The number of Gazans legally working in Israel (where the jobs are) has fallen from a pre-Arafat figure of 116,000 to as low as 23,000. The percentage of goods manufactured in Gaza and marketed in the West Bank (where the consumers are) declined from about 50 percent to 2 percent by 1996. In the first two years of Arafat's rule, one-third of Gazan businesses folded. Foreign commercial investment in Gaza declined from $520 million in 1993 to below $300 million in 1997. The number of Palestinians living in poverty soared; one out of every four now lives below the poverty line.
In President Arafat's considered opinion, all of this is the fault of Israel, for its habit of closing off the Gaza Strip from time to time, disrupting the flow of commerce. "The Israel closure policy is the primary and direct cause for the dangerous decline in the performance of the Palestinian economy over the past five years," he declared Monday.
The sad reality is that Arafat probably used some of that aid money to buy bombs and finance terror.
He'll probably get even more aid, and therefore more weapons, as a result of the Israeli operation because soft-hearted Europeans and UN staffers can't stand to see the devastation of war.
The aid money will go down the gurgler, into the hands of arms dealers. |
