SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: wanna_bmw who wrote (77176)4/15/2002 7:05:36 PM
From: combjellyRespond to of 275872
 
"Then doesn't that beg the question,"

Sorry. I cannot come up with even a wild guess why they laid the chip out that way. I haven't been able to find a die photograph of a Palomino, so I don't know how the elements on the chip are arranged, but I do note that a Morgan is very rectangular while a Palomino is more squarish
sandpile.org
sandpile.org
But, for the TBred to be a 'dumb' shrink with an additional 256k of L2 cache tacked on and wind up right at 11mm is also stretching credibility a bit too much.

So it looks as if they changed the chip layout. Maybe it is something as mundane as the packaging equipment handles die better when one dimension is around 11mm. Or maybe it maps onto the wafer better. Or maybe they like messing with our heads...



To: wanna_bmw who wrote (77176)4/15/2002 10:03:22 PM
From: Joe NYCRead Replies (3) | Respond to of 275872
 
wbmw,

Then doesn't that beg the question, "If it isn't due to a larger cache, then why didn't they shrink the CPU in one dimension?"

I think AMD has added HDTV support to T-bred, and adopted the new 16:9 format.

Joe