Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tcmay who wrote (77184)	4/15/2002 8:13:29 PM
From: fyodor_	Respond to of 275872

Tim: Thus we have the spectacle of SI's chief censor--who I am assuming is "SI Administrator Jeff," as his is the only name we ever see Wasn't there an "SI Admin Bob" or something years ago who was pretty decent? I believe he was the victim of some SI downsizing&#133 Yeah, maybe Mani's thread is more censorious than most...but this means it should be Mani and His Gang doing the censoring, flawed though their popularity contest style of voting may be, not "SI Administrator Jeff" holding Elmer to a higher standard of behavior than is routinely seen on other threads. I would actually prefer it if the TOU could be enforced by Site Admins in such a maner that the more nasty personal attacks were avoided. I practice, however, I would agree with you that it can quickly turn into a "I'm gonna tell on you" situation&#133 Other than that, I believe you seriously misinterpret the moderation on this thread. -fyo

To: tcmay who wrote (77184)	4/15/2002 8:14:10 PM
From: niceguy767	Respond to of 275872

tcmay: "If Steve Harrris or NiceGuy or Win Smith or Bacchus makes these kinds of slurs, here on the Mind Control AMD thread, nothing happens. But if Intel supporters defend themselves, Mani announces that "a vote has been called." Ah, c'mon, tim...please don't lump us in with the guy whose posts are highlighted in post #77139...Surely you can overcome your INTC commonality with this guy for a second to see just how far out of line he is...There is absolutely zero excuse for responding in that matter, even if there was any substance to his false claims of motivation...This guy, if, a senior employee at INTC, needs to understand that his public "whining","false accusations","errors in judgment" and defamation reflect poorly not only on himself but also on INTC...he may be impressed with his condescending and demeaning comments, but I doubt if the head of human relations at INTC would be too impressed were he/she to read post #77139...I'd have to think, there are fortune 500 companies out there who would fire an employee for carrying on in public in such a manner...elmer should count himself fortunate if it is only SI that suspends him for 7 days!!!