Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: wanna_bmw who wrote (163881)	4/16/2002 3:01:26 PM
From: Tony Viola	Respond to of 186894

Sounds a little too good to be true. I'll believe it when I see it, but at the rate AMD has been heading, it's almost believable. For their sake, Hammer better perform a lot better than these figures are indicating. Well, Hammer has the big SOI dependency, which the other thread is partly declaring at least problematic, because a new roadmap has Barton apparently w/o SOI. Not enough emphasis is placed on assumptions and dependencies around here, IMO. Maybe we need a degree of difficulty factor assigned to these Intel and AMD projects, like in diving. SOI = ??. Hammer AND SOI = ??? P4 continuing to scale, on target, in clock speed = ?? 90 nanometer = ?? Prescott = ?? Prescott and 90 nm = ?? Tony