SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Dutch Central Bank Sale Announcement Imminent? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: marcos who wrote (13749)4/16/2002 8:24:35 PM
From: sea_urchin  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 81364
 
Marcos >the engines would retain integrity in recognisable form, but inside...

Looking at the pictures of the outside of the building it's clear that the engines didn't even get as far as the walls, let alone through them. Not only are there no engine parts lying around but there isn't even a scratch where the engines should have struck the building.

But I don't blame you for not wanting to accept what I am suggesting. The implications are too horrible too contemplate.

I've given up trying to predict the demise of the USD so now I don't even look at the chart. But I am pleased that the stock market went up a lot today. Of course, that doesn't do my gold shares much good but it does suggest that war in the ME, and wherever else, could be a little further away.



To: marcos who wrote (13749)4/17/2002 8:31:03 AM
From: Alan Whirlwind  Respond to of 81364
 
Marcos, it was the taxi driver interviewed. The plane was flying so low overhead that it took out a light pole which toppled onto the hood of the guy's taxi.



To: marcos who wrote (13749)4/20/2002 7:19:11 PM
From: sea_urchin  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 81364
 
Marcos, here is the "Official Opinion" why no aircraft debris was found at the site of the Pentagon crash.

"Apparently without the least fear of laying itself open to ridicule, the Defense Department declared that the jet engines, made out of tempered steel, had disintegrated under the shock of the impact - without damaging the facade. The aluminum of the fuselage is claimed to have combusted at more than 2,500 Celsius within the building and to have been transformed into gas, but the bodies of the passengers which it contained were so little burned that they were later identified from their finger prints.

Responding to journalists during a press conference at the Pentagon, the fire chief claimed that "no voluminous debris from the aircraft" had remained, "nor any piece of the fuselage, nor anything of that sort". He declared that neither he nor his men knew what had become of the aircraft. "

rense.com

However, what is of more interest to me is this:

"According to those close to George W. Bush, in the course of the morning, the Secret Service received a telephone call from those behind the attacks, apparently in order to make demands. To give credence to their demands, the masterminds revealed the secret codes giving access to the secure telephone lines available to the president for secure communication with the various intelligence agencies and services as well as for access to the nuclear arsenal . In fact, only a very few persons with the highest security clearances, in the top ranks of the government, could have had these codes. It follows that at least one of the persons behind the attacks of September 11 has a top government post, either civilian or military."

Now, I wonder who that was?