SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ptanner who wrote (77329)4/17/2002 2:55:36 AM
From: PetzRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 275872
 
By not including any goodwill or goodwill impairments in this quarter's report, they are just doing what the SEC allows. But I find Intel's "comparative analysis" to be the lowest form of deceit except Enron in the last 12 months:

First-quarter net income was $936 million, up 86 percent sequentially and up 93 percent year-over-year. (BULLSH!T) Earnings per share were $0.14, up 100 percent from $0.07 in both the first and fourth quarters of 2001. (BULLSH!T) In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), earnings in the 2001 periods reflect charges for the amortization of goodwill, which is no longer amortized in the current year with the adoption of FASB statement 142.


By throwing that magic phrase in near the end, "in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles," the typical reader stops reading the rest of the sentence and says, "Wow, great, they doubled profits and it's not even some kind of pro-forma earnings." O really, Intel? How come when I visit your website I see the following headlines from your prior press releases?

Intel Reports Fourth-Quarter And Annual Results
Fourth-Quarter Earnings Excluding Acquisition-Related Costs* $0.15 Per Share


and

Intel Reports First Quarter Revenue of $6.7 Billion
First Quarter Earnings Excluding Acquisition-Related Costs* $0.16 Per Share
First Quarter Earnings Per Share $0.07


The SEC should definitely not allow any percentage comparisons between periods when different accounting standards are used. This is total hypocrisy.

I really don't understand the aftermarket reaction. They exactly met expectations for both revenue and net income and they are giving such a wide range for Q2 than nothing new could be inferred from it.

I think both Intel and AMD will be down tomorrow, even relative to today's official close of 29.51 and 14.35.

Petz



To: ptanner who wrote (77329)4/17/2002 8:09:39 AM
From: niceguy767Respond to of 275872
 
ptanner:

Your post covers off my concerns from an accounting perspective...Additionally, I would claim that the 100% increase in q1/02 eps arose solely because INTC did not amortize about $425 million in q1/02 in goodwill as was the case last quarter and last year...Yes INTC reported what everyone, including myself, wants to hear, but only because of the accounting wizardry exhibited, by calculating eps without any expense provision for goodwill...