SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: LindyBill who wrote (25744)4/17/2002 9:03:26 AM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Here is a Post article that confirms the story we got from the Student on the situation in Venezuela

Media's Role in Crisis Becomes the Big Story in Venezuela
Networks Defend Coverage After Chavez Says They Backed Ouster


By Scott Wilson
Washington Post Foreign Service
Wednesday, April 17, 2002; Page A08

CARACAS, Venezuela, April 16 -- As an international delegation arrived to examine the political unrest that has shaken Venezuela, newspapers and broadcast stations began a public soul-searching today to explain their role in President Hugo Chavez's ouster and stunning return.

The role of the media, described by Chavez on Monday in an otherwise conciliatory news conference as "psychological terrorism," has become one of the most heated points of debate in the aftermath of Venezuela's political upheaval. Chavez has accused parts of the media of helping engineer his overthrow.

Media owners acknowledged today that they intensely covered Chavez's fall but largely failed to give enough attention to the protests that helped restore him to power two days later. But the gap, they contended, was rooted in fear of hostile crowds and in journalistic judgment, not in partisanship.

"We're going to reflect," said Alberto Federico Ravell, owner of the news channel Globovision. "We are not going to let this stain our reputation."

The media's self-analysis came as a delegation of the Organization of American States began investigating Venezuela's fragile and polarized democracy, which broke down Thursday with Chavez's ouster by the military. But the military's choice of interim government collapsed two days later, returning Chavez to the presidency he won in 1998. Officials today raised the number of people killed in rioting and protests to 68.

Cesar Gaviria, the OAS secretary general, met with media leaders, who have long had a hostile relationship with the president, to hear their account of recent events.

The media have been highly critical of Chavez's populist programs, friendships with Cuba, Iraq and Libya, and autocratic style. His incendiary rhetoric, often delivered on private televisions stations commandeered for frequent evening speeches, commonly targets the media.

As a national strike that began a week ago became a call for Chavez's resignation, television stations and newspapers were dominated by intensive coverage of the events. The protests were capped by a march on the presidential palace Thursday that brought several hundred thousand people into the streets.

Chavez pulled private television stations off the air during the march just before shooting broke out near the presidential palace, leaving 14 people dead. The military intervened soon after, demanding Chavez's resignation and eventually replacing him with an interim government headed by the leader of Venezuela's largest business group, whose members include the large media companies.

Media owners met Saturday with the new president, Pedro Carmona, even before his ministers were sworn in. But as the interim government began to unravel amid military dissension and large pro-Chavez demonstrations, television stations began broadcasting cooking shows and Hollywood movies, leaving much of the country without access to news about the unfolding political events and surging street violence.

"The coverage was impossible," said a senior executive at the Cisneros Group, which owns the influential Venevision television station and parts of the local Direct TV franchise, Univision, and Caracol Television. "We had the information, but we didn't have the images. It was a very responsible thing not to show half the story."

Gustavo Cisneros, who owns the media group, said on Venevision that coverage of the events by Univision and CNN's Spanish-language channel was carried on his company's Direct TV. He said pro-Chavez mobs made it impossible for his journalists to work safely, so he kept them off the streets.

If media executives thought the lack of coverage Saturday would keep people at home, they were wrong. Residents of poor neighborhoods descended on the palace, wondering what was happening to the president. Mariana Bustamante, 32, left her home in the Cano Amarillo neighborhood and went to Miraflores, the palace.

"Saturday came and we knew nothing," said Bustamante, who sells blouses from a street-side kiosk in this capital. "We had to know what was happening, so we just went there."