Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: wanna_bmw who wrote (164134)	4/17/2002 3:20:49 PM
From: Tony Viola	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

bmw, >P.S. I just dumped all my AMD shares this morning @ $15.20. So you made a few bucks? Can't beat that with a stick. Article about Prescott and Hammer, talking about different clock speeds for different functions on a Prescott chip: In a 130 nm process at a low 1.2 Volt: - 4.0 GHz 32 bit Address Generator - 5.0 GHz Integer Execution Core - 4.5 GHz 32 k byte Cache Imagine the howling by Ali Baba and the Forty Thieves when they see this. I would like to point out that computers have had various clock speeds on different functions since day, well, very early. Smart, efficient design, with just a little pain in the synchronization where functions talk to each other. chip-architect.com